help - search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: CIA behind Latin American leaders' cancers?
fmforums > discussion forums > politics
ezra_z
Its an interesting conspiracy: Leaders of Venezuela (Chavez), Argentina (Cristina Kirchner), Brazil (Rousseff AND Lula) and Paraguay (Lugo) all have cancer now...Chavez says the CIA is behind it. Anything's possible with our friendly US government i guess, especially with the now declassified history of secretive CIA plots against leaders all over Latin America. :S


http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2011/...-my-cancer.html
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-28/c...ers-cancer.html

QUOTE
Chavez: U.S. May Have Caused My Cancer
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is hinting that the U.S. may be behind a “very strange” bout of cancer affecting several leaders aligned with him in South America, reports Bloomberg.

Chavez, speaking a day after Argentine President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner was diagnosed with thyroid cancer, said the Central Intelligence Agency was behind chemical experiments in Guatemala in the 1940s and that it’s possible that in years to come a plot will be uncovered that shows the U.S. spread cancer as a political weapon against its critics.

“It’s very difficult to explain, even with the law of probabilities, what has been happening to some of us in Latin America,” Chavez said in a nationally televised speech to the military. “Would it be so strange that they’ve invented technology to spread cancer and we won’t know about it for 50 years?”

Chavez, who was diagnosed with an undisclosed form of cancer in June and had a baseball-sized tumor removed in Cuba, has called for a regional summit of leaders who have battled cancer including Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff, her predecessor Luiz Inacio Lula Da Silva and Paraguay’s Fernando Lugo.

This shouldn't come as a surprise to EPJ readers. This is what I wrote in August:

Chavez has recently been undergoing treatment for what many suspect is cancer. Talk in certain parts of D.C. is that the CIA has slowly exposed him to very toxic, cancer causing materials.

I doubled-down on this theory in October, when I wrote:

Connecting the Dots: Gaddafi is Dead, Obama Sends Troops to Central Africa

The United States government is playing a major global power game...This is in addition to everything else that is going on in the Middle East. And my very strong suspicions about the cancer that Hugo Chavez is suffering with. A huge global chess game is being played. PCR [Paul Craig Robert]'s closing question is most apt:

Will the US collapse in economic chaos before it rules the world?

If I am looking at what is going on on the global map and I am Vladimir Putin, I'm worried, real worried.
Parsifal
Now you're quoting a communist? blink.gif
paddyirl
Gotta love him sometimes lol_2.gif

I mean the idea that the US would be able to give leaders cancer seems unlikely however it would be awfully convenient for them if these left wing leaders all did drop dead.
poland74
QUOTE(paddyirl @ Dec 29 2011, 22:16) *

Gotta love him sometimes lol_2.gif

I mean the idea that the US would be able to give leaders cancer seems unlikely however it would be awfully convenient for them if these left wing leaders all did drop dead.


True but if it were possible why haven't they done it to some more "extreme" world leaders they don't like either past or present, i.e Gadaffi, Castro, Mugabe, Hussein, Jong-Il and so on.
Parsifal
Sounds like a communist conspiracy theory to me. wink.gif
Roger Mellie
QUOTE(ParsifalNYC @ Dec 31 2011, 14:52) *

Sounds like a communist conspiracy theory to me. wink.gif


Were they to blame for Harold Wilson resigning in 1976, that's what I want to know w00t.gif
paddyirl
QUOTE(poland74 @ Dec 31 2011, 13:43) *

QUOTE(paddyirl @ Dec 29 2011, 22:16) *

Gotta love him sometimes lol_2.gif

I mean the idea that the US would be able to give leaders cancer seems unlikely however it would be awfully convenient for them if these left wing leaders all did drop dead.


True but if it were possible why haven't they done it to some more "extreme" world leaders they don't like either past or present, i.e Gadaffi, Castro, Mugabe, Hussein, Jong-Il and so on.


Maybe because since they were dictators it was easy to gather international support against them whereas the leaders of South America have all been democratically elected and enjoy high levels of international support from Europe, Africa and Asia.

I don't think that it is the case in this situation that the USA have infected them with cancer but their history with infecting people in Guatemala in the 1940s with STDs means they have a precedence. It is why Chavez suggested that in 50 years we might find out like we did with the STD thing.

Infecting someone with an STD is one thing, it seems like it would be much more difficult to do it with cancer lol_2.gif Hence why I doubt it could be true. But like one person said in the comment section of a news story about this that I read, Chavez can always get publicity worldwide, how many other leaders would love to be able to get such press attention.
poland74


Maybe because since they were dictators it was easy to gather international support against them whereas the leaders of South America have all been democratically elected and enjoy high levels of international support from Europe, Africa and Asia.



Really? Venezuela and Paraguay I thought were dictatorships. Possibly elected once many years ago but elections since have not exactly been free and fair from what I understand. I may be wrong but on a programme I recently watched which featured Venezuela, Chavez rules with an iron fist.
Parsifal
Wasn't Salvador Allende elected in a free election in Chile before the CIA assasinated him in 1973?
But then, that was a different era.
Kev
QUOTE(ParsifalNYC @ Jan 7 2012, 20:27) *

Wasn't Salvador Allende elected in a free election in Chile before the CIA assasinated him in 1973?
But then, that was a different era.


Hitler was elected as well. Or his party was.
Parsifal
QUOTE(Kev @ Jan 8 2012, 00:45) *

QUOTE(ParsifalNYC @ Jan 7 2012, 20:27) *

Wasn't Salvador Allende elected in a free election in Chile before the CIA assasinated him in 1973?
But then, that was a different era.


Hitler was elected as well. Or his party was.

I was using Allende as a counter-example where the CIA assasinated an elected head of state.
paddyirl
QUOTE(poland74 @ Jan 7 2012, 15:01) *

Maybe because since they were dictators it was easy to gather international support against them whereas the leaders of South America have all been democratically elected and enjoy high levels of international support from Europe, Africa and Asia.



Really? Venezuela and Paraguay I thought were dictatorships. Possibly elected once many years ago but elections since have not exactly been free and fair from what I understand. I may be wrong but on a programme I recently watched which featured Venezuela, Chavez rules with an iron fist.


lol_2.gif You a big fan of FOX News then.

The Venezuelan media despise Chavez, people there call for his assassination on TV. Would that be tolerated in the UK. Channels like Venevision, Globovision and RCTV (which helped people run an illegal coup against him) all bash Chavez daily.

Not to mention election monitors have said the electoral machines in Venezuela would be extremely difficult to tamper with.

The Carter Centre, European Union, Organisation of American States and Mercosur ALL oversaw the 2006 Presidential Election.

Venezuela is rare in that Chavez's constitution permits the recall of all elected officials, this was attempted against him in 2003 and failed disastrously for the opposition.

I suggest you watch Oliver Stone's documentary South of the Border.

QUOTE(ParsifalNYC @ Jan 8 2012, 15:36) *

QUOTE(Kev @ Jan 8 2012, 00:45) *

QUOTE(ParsifalNYC @ Jan 7 2012, 20:27) *

Wasn't Salvador Allende elected in a free election in Chile before the CIA assasinated him in 1973?
But then, that was a different era.


Hitler was elected as well. Or his party was.

I was using Allende as a counter-example where the CIA assasinated an elected head of state.


Yes and replaced Allende with the American and European backed Pinochet who was possibly the worst ever dictator in the Americas.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2013 Invision Power Services, Inc.