IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

support our charity appeal

megapost
Gay Times
Attitude

help
info
support

look
view
view tube
request

specials
special forums

calvin klein

talk
the premium forum
gossip
movies tv
politics
music
gaming
agony
gadgets

iTunes
nude celebrity database


 

58 Pages V  1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> The US Presidential Election 2012, we're off ... we debated ... and it's finally over.
KernowKid
post Apr 4 2011, 10:23
Post #1


iplayer is my life
Group Icon

Group: premium A-list
Posts: 17079
Joined: 23-May 04
From: Truro, Cornwall
Member No.: 6



So I suppose the campaign leading to the polls on 6th November 2012 can be officially declared open....

Barack Obama has confirmed his intention to run for a second term today ....

Today, we are filing papers to launch our 2012 campaign.

We're doing this now because the politics we believe in does not start with expensive TV ads or extravaganzas, but with you -- with people organizing block-by-block, talking to neighbors, co-workers, and friends. And that kind of campaign takes time to build.

So even though I'm focused on the job you elected me to do, and the race may not reach full speed for a year or more, the work of laying the foundation for our campaign must start today.

We've always known that lasting change wouldn't come quickly or easily. It never does. But as my administration and folks across the country fight to protect the progress we've made -- and make more -- we also need to begin mobilizing for 2012, long before the time comes for me to begin campaigning in earnest.

Barack.

This post has been edited by KernowKid: Jan 20 2013, 18:45
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Parsifal
post Apr 4 2011, 14:52
Post #2


fmf is my life
Group Icon

Group: premium B-list
Posts: 12135
Joined: 15-August 05
From: The Big Apple
Member No.: 20117



In order to understand American politics in the current era one needs to step back and see the big picture. That's hard for anyone to do because the forces at play are very large.

My take on the situation is this:
Elections in the US, and particularly the presidential election and congressional elections, are a grab for power by two major opposing forces. One force represents the interests of the public at large. The party that best embodies those interests, albeit imperfectly, is the Democratic party. The other force is that of the oligarchs, very wealthy, powerful and few. They find their representation in government with the Republican party. Over the last 30 years the oligarchs have been gaining more and more ground at the expense of the welfare of the general public.

The confluence of these forces was best seen recently in the battle for extension of the Bush tax cuts. That battle pitted tax breaks for the 2% wealthiest individuals in America (supported by the Republicans and opposed by the Democrats) against extending unemployment benefits for the longterm unemployed (supported by the Democrats and opposed by the Republicans). The contrast was glaring and the Republicans had no shame. They didn't have to, they're on a roll and winning.

An odd phenomenon has been that in the two years that Obama has been president he has drifted more and more to looking like a Republican. My speculation is that somebody has somebody by the balls. That was my speculation during the Bush presidency when Democrats were voting yes on some of the most heinous legislation put forth by the Republicans. And now, less than two years before the next presidential election, Obama is playing it safe and taking no risks. The man guy has no balls.

We don't know yet how the Republican primaries are going to shake out, but so far the Republican field just looks like a bunch of loopy clowns save maybe for Mitt Romney. I don't like him very much, but dishonest as he is, he is the only one so far who is this side of sanity. His major weakness is Romneycare on which Obamacare was modeled.

If anything the upcoming presidential race will be entertaining, we'll either be laughing lol_2.gif or crying upset.gif .

The United States is a very weird place (and very powerful). wink.gif

This post has been edited by ParsifalNYC: Apr 4 2011, 14:55
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ic1male
post Apr 4 2011, 14:53
Post #3


fmf is my life
Group Icon

Group: Validating
Posts: 17362
Joined: 30-May 04
Member No.: 853



Unfortunately it doesn't look like my dream of Billary vs Palin for 2012 is going to come true. sad.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jazze
post Apr 4 2011, 15:07
Post #4


regular user
Group Icon

Group: Z-list
Posts: 121
Joined: 13-November 09
Member No.: 66273



QUOTE(ParsifalNYC @ Apr 4 2011, 15:52) *
One force represents the interests of the public at large. The party that best embodies those interests, albeit imperfectly, is the Democratic party. The other force is that of the oligarchs, very wealthy, powerful and few. They find their representation in government with the Republican party. Over the last 30 years the oligarchs have been gaining more and more ground at the expense of the welfare of the general public.


Lol democrats representing people's best interests! Typical New Yorker smile.gif

The truth is neither cares about you. They're both basically the same.

Reps buy votes by giving people tax breaks, Dems buy votes by promising benefits, healthcare, higher minimum wage and free everything. Both have crony deals with large banks/military companies/oil companies. The gov't works for them. (When big corporations combine with autocratic government thats fascism. Thats what you have)

QUOTE(ParsifalNYC @ Apr 4 2011, 15:52) *
If anything the upcoming presidential race will be entertaining, we'll either be laughing lol_2.gif or crying upset.gif .


Unfortunately, you'll be crying both ways. You're broke, and none of the politicians want to do anything about it. The rest of the world will suffer too.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Boy1der
post Apr 4 2011, 15:08
Post #5


addicted user
Group Icon

Group: Z-list
Posts: 3189
Joined: 21-January 07
From: Santa Cruz Ca.
Member No.: 40362



Ugh, already?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jazze
post Apr 4 2011, 15:13
Post #6


regular user
Group Icon

Group: Z-list
Posts: 121
Joined: 13-November 09
Member No.: 66273



Interesting fact: Obamao wants to raise 1 BILLION USD in campaign contributions. (I love white collar language: Campaign contributions are BRIBES ffs)

In 1996 slick Willie Clinton raised 46 million.

2500% increase. This lobbying is getting expensive for the corporations smile.gif

http://www.fec.gov/press/press2005/2005020.../presbigpic.pdf
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Parsifal
post Apr 4 2011, 15:44
Post #7


fmf is my life
Group Icon

Group: premium B-list
Posts: 12135
Joined: 15-August 05
From: The Big Apple
Member No.: 20117



QUOTE(jazze @ Apr 4 2011, 11:07) *

QUOTE(ParsifalNYC @ Apr 4 2011, 15:52) *
One force represents the interests of the public at large. The party that best embodies those interests, albeit imperfectly, is the Democratic party. The other force is that of the oligarchs, very wealthy, powerful and few. They find their representation in government with the Republican party. Over the last 30 years the oligarchs have been gaining more and more ground at the expense of the welfare of the general public.


Lol democrats representing people's best interests! Typical New Yorker smile.gif

The truth is neither cares about you. They're both basically the same.

Reps buy votes by giving people tax breaks, Dems buy votes by promising benefits, healthcare, higher minimum wage and free everything. Both have crony deals with large banks/military companies/oil companies. The gov't works for them. (When big corporations combine with autocratic government thats fascism. Thats what you have)

No contest.

I did say:

QUOTE(ParsifalNYC @ Apr 4 2011, 10:52) *

My take on the situation is this:
Elections in the US, and particularly the presidential election and congressional elections, are a grab for power by two major opposing forces.

And I did say that the Democrats embody those interests "imperfectly".
Motives are another matter. Regardless of how much (or how little) the Democrats care about the public at large they did give us Social Security (which the Republicans have been trying to kill since its inception in 1935), Medicare (which the Republicans have been trying to kill since its inception in 1965), regulation against corporate abuses, environmental protection, etc.

As much as the Democrats are bad guys too we can thank them for raising the standard of living of the average American beginning with the New Deal.

And I believe that I've said in these forums that I consider politicians (Democrat or Republican) to be the bottom of the barrel, lower than prostitutes. (I don't hold prostitutes in low regard, quite the contrary, but just want to place politicians in their relative place because they are prostitutes. At least the ladies of the night are honest about it.)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kev
post Apr 4 2011, 21:16
Post #8


addicted user
Group Icon

Group: Z-list
Posts: 3715
Joined: 2-November 08
From: Atlanta
Member No.: 59470



QUOTE
Lol democrats representing people's best interests! Typical New Yorker


"Typical New Yorker"?

I'm a southerner and I know that the Democrats will look after me a helluva lot better than the Republicans.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jazze
post Apr 4 2011, 22:59
Post #9


regular user
Group Icon

Group: Z-list
Posts: 121
Joined: 13-November 09
Member No.: 66273



Why do you want your gov't to steal money from one group of people to pay to "look after you"?

You can't name 1 good thing that government runs really well. You can't even say military/defense anymore.

Why would you want them running your economy and your life.

This post has been edited by jazze: Apr 4 2011, 23:12
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Parsifal
post Apr 5 2011, 03:23
Post #10


fmf is my life
Group Icon

Group: premium B-list
Posts: 12135
Joined: 15-August 05
From: The Big Apple
Member No.: 20117



QUOTE(jazze @ Apr 4 2011, 18:59) *

Why do you want your gov't to steal money from one group of people to pay to "look after you"?

You could say that the "European-style socialist welfare state" (as the Republicans like to call it) compensates the disadvantaged for injustices in the system.

QUOTE(jazze @ Apr 4 2011, 18:59) *

You can't name 1 good thing that government runs really well. You can't even say military/defense anymore.

Of course not. They're all incompetent and corrupt. But the "socialist" state that the Democrats have built starting in the FDR era has substantially reduced the amount of poverty in this country, particularly among the elderly. The Republicans (and their benefactors) would love to roll the clock back to pre-New Deal when old age meant certain dire poverty for most. Back then you couldn't afford to retire, a phenomenon that is now creeping back into American life.

QUOTE(jazze @ Apr 4 2011, 18:59) *

Why would you want them running your economy and your life.

To protect you from the oligarchs pushing the country toward a feudal-like society.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Boy1der
post Apr 5 2011, 04:49
Post #11


addicted user
Group Icon

Group: Z-list
Posts: 3189
Joined: 21-January 07
From: Santa Cruz Ca.
Member No.: 40362



Please close this thread until next year.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
CBEntr
post Apr 5 2011, 10:36
Post #12


Oscars Winner 09, 10, 12
Group Icon

Group: premium B-list
Posts: 2641
Joined: 23-June 08
From: San Diego, CA USA
Member No.: 55932



To lighten the mood, let us see what the Republican's have so far....

Donald Trump, birther, anti-gay, believer of Plutocracy..

Newt Gingrich, adulter (twice), married thrice, anti-gay, family advocate...

Mike Huckabee, Christian Nation, stoically anti-gay theocrat...

Michelle Bachmann, stoically anti-gay theocrat, follower of McCarthism....

Tim Pawlenty, stoically anti-gay, far right Tea Party conservative....

Sarah Palin, anti-gay, other views depend on her mood, subject to change at any time...

This post has been edited by CBEntr: Apr 5 2011, 10:39
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ic1male
post Apr 5 2011, 10:59
Post #13


fmf is my life
Group Icon

Group: Validating
Posts: 17362
Joined: 30-May 04
Member No.: 853



Mitt Romney?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
CBEntr
post Apr 5 2011, 12:49
Post #14


Oscars Winner 09, 10, 12
Group Icon

Group: premium B-list
Posts: 2641
Joined: 23-June 08
From: San Diego, CA USA
Member No.: 55932



QUOTE(ic1male @ Apr 5 2011, 03:59) *

Mitt Romney?

Haven't heard much from him, he's been keeping a low profile, however.....

Theocrat, anti-gay staunch Mormon, Western White House will probably be the temple in Utah where he will be told how to run the country by his elders...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kev
post Apr 5 2011, 18:06
Post #15


addicted user
Group Icon

Group: Z-list
Posts: 3715
Joined: 2-November 08
From: Atlanta
Member No.: 59470



QUOTE(CBEntr @ Apr 5 2011, 10:36) *

To lighten the mood, let us see what the Republican's have so far....

Donald Trump, birther, anti-gay, believer of Plutocracy..

Newt Gingrich, adulter (twice), married thrice, anti-gay, family advocate...

Mike Huckabee, Christian Nation, stoically anti-gay theocrat...

Michelle Bachmann, stoically anti-gay theocrat, follower of McCarthism....

Tim Pawlenty, stoically anti-gay, far right Tea Party conservative....

Sarah Palin, anti-gay, other views depend on her mood, subject to change at any time...


These are the best the Republicans can throw out there?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jazze
post Apr 5 2011, 18:53
Post #16


regular user
Group Icon

Group: Z-list
Posts: 121
Joined: 13-November 09
Member No.: 66273



They're all incompetent corrupt scum on both sides.

Ron Paul is your only hope.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kev
post Apr 5 2011, 19:04
Post #17


addicted user
Group Icon

Group: Z-list
Posts: 3715
Joined: 2-November 08
From: Atlanta
Member No.: 59470



QUOTE
Ron Paul is your only hope.


Ron Paul is an ass.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jazze
post Apr 5 2011, 20:38
Post #18


regular user
Group Icon

Group: Z-list
Posts: 121
Joined: 13-November 09
Member No.: 66273



QUOTE(Kev @ Apr 5 2011, 20:04) *

QUOTE
Ron Paul is your only hope.


Ron Paul is an ass.


Great argument. I think you're just an ignorant biggot and know nothing about him. (Or if you do, you're someone who freeloads off the government and fears losing those benefits.)

Paul is impeccably principled. He has a consistant voting track record and has over 30 years never sold out. He defends the constitution and the rights of the people.

If standing for liberty and justice makes someone an ass, then I'm an ass too.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Parsifal
post Apr 5 2011, 21:10
Post #19


fmf is my life
Group Icon

Group: premium B-list
Posts: 12135
Joined: 15-August 05
From: The Big Apple
Member No.: 20117



rolleyes.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jazze
post Apr 5 2011, 21:12
Post #20


regular user
Group Icon

Group: Z-list
Posts: 121
Joined: 13-November 09
Member No.: 66273



Remember where you came from. Your ancestors fled tyrannical british empire or fought hard for emancipation, freedom from slavery and equality infront of the law.

What you're doing now is handing all your freedoms to a banking cartel controlled fascist tyranny.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

58 Pages V  1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

- Lo-Fi Version fmf time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 13:16
IMPORTANT - PLEASE NOTE
No porn, fakes, personal ads, polls, spam, petitions or lists. Celebrities "Home Sex Videos", stills or pictures from them are not permitted. No male models. Pictures should be of famous male celebrities over 18. Do not ask for pictures to be emailed to you or for people to email you for pictures. If you are in any doubt regarding the authenticity or appropriateness of a picture, contact a member of staff before posting. Do not assume you have any rights to post messages on this board. We reserve the right to ban you from the service if the rules are broken. Your IP address may be blocked to restrict you from rejoining. Images are not hosted by this site, they are hosted on individual members webspace. We do not claim any rights over images posted and assume the individual posting the image has permission to do so. If you believe an image should not be displayed here please contact us and request removal of the posting. By posting on the forums, you agree that you remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your messages. We reserve the right to reveal your identity (or whatever information we know about you) in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.

BY POSTING ANY MESSAGE OR IMAGE ON THIS SITE YOU ARE CONFIRMING THAT YOU HAVE READ,
UNDERSTOOD & AGREED TO ABIDE BY THE RULES OF THIS SERVICE

© 2013 famousmales.com All Rights Reserved Contact Us    About Cookies